Without falling in disqualification, I’ll let you be the only insult. : P (So keep your happiness and I have mine If ?).
1) Want to jump on the bandwagon of the tablets and smartphones and regular users to use as guinea pigs (first with the netbook remix, now with unity)
Are you required to use Ubuntu? Just tell me yes or no.
Or who came to your house with a gun and used you as a guinea pig toward Unity. If so, to report it!.
Do not you realized that you could have used XFCE, LXDE, KDE with Ubuntu, rather completito? Well find out! You were not forced to use Unity, or cooperate, as I do not other distros.
must see many locks are placed before the chains. pfff .. My condolences.
2) Try to save costs for a single development team focusing on Unity
course, and certainly many distributions now, innovated his own shell, but still keeping all environments alike, they paste on a free OS and free you have not paid either $ 1 or donated . (If so, you were not commenting here Mintero: P). Since it was late seeing no one around here.
not that team focuses on Unity. As far as I know, NO PARTNER IS REQUIRED TO WORK WITH UNITY.
If they wish
WHY NOT? If you want to work with Kubuntu KDE, do it! You have the doors open.
addition to offering the best KDE (in Kubuntu, for me yes!), all integrated into KDE, GTK applications with full support and a huge repository.
Focus your development? I’d like someday to innovate, and keep something for free. What a waste of paragraph. Rejoice! I took it into account. : P
if there were any user who does not want to put your ass, eliminated the possibility of using classic gnome … what the heck, now that I see!: If you had installed gnome classic eliminate it! ! …. making lentils
Hahaha. Do you speak first and then your ignorance? Well! Come on.
not if you already know, but I’ll give the explanation (though I think yes, but as noted you’re Mintero, you like to step explanations).
classic Gnome, 2.32, has dependencies on GTK 2, and using Gnome 3, had to remove the dependencies of GTK 2, and thus was eliminated Gnome 2.32. Since there is now GTK 3, a completely renovated toolkit, and that even the GTK # (Your bindings) are in version 2.
gnome, you can use Gnome Classic, if you did not know, only the Gnome 3 without shell.
get Gnome 2.32 (do not know if doing the repository, since I use Debian Testing) is in the repository or CD (remove space, it also removed), and install it, would cause great instability problem and as ubuntu think enough on the end user, and so no stalls to “Minteros” pulling pests to heaven, then, was the best.
Could I ask you spend a distribution that uses GNOME 3-Shell, and also has the ability to use Gnome 2.32 now?
If so, please! Let me know so you avoid rather than comment, go lowering it and be happy, and not in strings Canonical constraints. Yes? (One advantage to get on the self-esteem). : P
face of protests, raised his chin and loose in any case this is a democracy (and I thought it was a free community where everyone was entitled to be heard).
Hehe! As someone who hurt my comment. Sure, still with pitorreo (test it). You’re not someone who I named in this post? No need to change their nick: P (If Rodrigo ?).
I. The quality of a distribution do not think that is measured by its popularity (see eg slackware).
Ok, now let’s all use Slackware, but not popular then, knowing that all we use. And when it is, name another distro that is not popular to use, and say that quality has not become popular.
I like your analogy
. Demonstrate pure intellectuality. (Seriously, until I stopped laughing when I read it: P) …. I mean, I’m tired! : S
I know that for debianites ubuntu is like for David Bisbal heavy metal …
You said it yourself, so are most debianites. With gigantic egos, are the “scholars” of Linux, as long as they throw Ubuntu on the floor, and talk about Ubuntu as metalheads speak ill of Justin Bieber.
And worse, listen more Justin Bieber to criticize the metal with which the vent. Strange things we see is not it? That’s an intellectual and use the time. Great genius. I’m going with my comment on debianites best reasons.
that, I use Debian Testing with KDE 4.6.5, I’m in forums of them, because most of the comments are disgusting when they refer to Ubuntu.
left in its dawn of resentment, and they could live happily supporting each other, between 4. If
In fact, if you’ve read a recent article here at Mint muylinux surveys ask for Mint leaves time basis ubuntu for debian.
that, hate Ubuntu, rather than the man who lay with his wife. Not surprisingly, were not born yesterday estimadito.
as they prefer anything other than Ubuntu, as it gives them hives. They think based on Ubuntu as they have done since they left (and will do), and thus be better able to fill the mouth, saying that “mint is better than ubuntu and is not based on him.”
I keep expecting
become independent of Debian. I say for you, because by my no problem. Or load in my life, and I can live happy.
Now Do you? I think not! At least that Mint is based on Debian and Ubuntu as we know it is like the metalheads Bisbal (According to your analogy of great years of research lol) … .. Pffff ….
see …. Did no insult me? Nah! I leave you. I’ll help: “Mint is better, but 95% dependent on Ubuntu. Debian and Ubuntu for serious people for beginners, does nothing and then …. Debian is still better. “
Eh … I
with what I said, convinced that I keep using Debian Testing. Believe me that it was going to be changed by Ubuntu, now I hate it. : P haha
seriously, do you ever worked with Ubuntu? In doing so, you do it with Debian Did you know? If not, ask a prominent developer who spends his free time working and not fanatic blogs linuxers a career goal. : P