first_main_article” class=”article readability=”43″>Speed ​​Dreams

Open Source is a racing game which we discussed in its version 1.4, which works on both Windows and Linux, and is based on Torcs, but comes with major improvements such as new cars, tracks with an intelligence enhanced artificial opponents, especially in the newly announced version Speed ​​Dreams 2.0 Beta 1 .

 speed 500x310 dreams and the Furious: Speed ​​Dreams 2.0 Beta 1 available

beta and can enjoy the game considerably, but the Beta 2 will have improved circuits, detailed cars and WIN a new menu design game , as revealed in WebUpd8 .

expected to Speed ​​Dreams 2 to include an online multiplayer mode, but developers can not take time to implement this option, so are looking for someone to help them achieve online run mode , so if you have wanted to step into this world, go to this page to inform you.

 speed 500x467 dreams menus and the Furious: Speed ​​Dreams 2.0 Beta 1 available

Speed ​​Dreams

To install Linux 2.0 Beta 1 can access the PPA available

sudo apt

 add-ppa-repository: speed-dreams/ppasudo apt-get updatesudo apt-get install speed-dreams 

apparently run from the menu does not work, so from terminal or Alt + F2 will have to type the command

 / usr/games/speed-dreams-2 

launch. to enjoy driving at full throttle

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement

first_main_article” class=”article readability=”49″>

few months ago was very fashionable to debate on instant start operating systems (Splashtop was the most popular system) and boot times also be reduced to the minimum pursued in various distributions , and especially one of them: Ubuntu.

 Ubuntu 500x378 11.10 UbuntuBoot slower start, what was the fast start, Canonical?

Canonical

was very heavy with the topic : in MuyLinux we, for example, claimed that some time down the 10 seconds or even 5 seconds to boot a system with Ubuntu, and distribution developers seemed particularly aimed at achieving this reduction in boot times.

Let’s jump

this: today and Canonical or other developers talk about reducing boot times . The focus is on the desktop environments in the cloud and in-store applications. That aspect has been neglected so fundamental that seemed just a year ago.

study shows they have done on Phoronix, and which have compared the start of a preliminary version of Ubuntu Ubuntu 11.10 to 11.04, and WIN have shown the charts and start times with different teams , from netbooks to basic desktop PC hardware configurations pretty decent. Data:

ASUS Eee PC

  • (Intel Atom 330, HD SATA): 31.4 s in Natty, 59.62 s in oneiric
  • NetTop ASRock (Intel Atom 330, HD SATA) 25 s in Natty, 58 s in oneiric
  • MSI

  • NetTop (Intel Atom 330, HD SATA) 25 s in Natty, 27 s in oneiric
  • AMD Opteron 2348 (quad-core, SSD) in Natty 7.78 s, 11.09 s in oneiric
  • Intel

  • Sandy Bridge, SSD: s in Natty 24.66, 35.26 s in oneiric
  • Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, SATA HD: 23.20 s in Natty, 31.69 s in oneiric
  • Ocelot takes a lot more (in some cases, twice) to boot than its predecessor (I would say that in turn also lost about Maverick Meerkat bellows) and Canonical seems clear that this factor has been neglected.

    The question is, of course, if the start times were really important to Canonical (and for us, the users), or was simply an effort to give that talk . Personally I think those are important start-up times for users, but not crucial, and Canonical’s attitude in this regard is at least disappointing.

    Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

    first_main_article” class=”article readability=”53″>

    Mozilla developers are fighting the advances of Chrome in the segment of browsers. The development of Google continues to grow market share at the expense of not only Internet Explorer but also Firefox, which is losing the occasional user for Chrome and Chromium.

     firefox Firefox 500x296 6 on 6 improves, but still not fast enough,

    Metalbyte

    said a few hours ago, Firefox is available in 6 and stable release, and although no official packages for the distributions you can install binary 32 and 64 bits offered by Mozilla enjoy the possibilities of this new version from scratch.

    developments are important, and you can discover all the change log maintained on the official Mozilla wiki. These include opportunities for developers (with a powerful new web console , among other things), optimization of the groups of tabs in Outlook or the new Scratchpad to test JavaScript code in a simple, and improved boot times.

    are also interesting new control options personal information and permissions (about: permissions) and memory (about: memory) in which you can check which data are yielding to certain web services and what parts of Firefox are responsible for memory consumption.

     Firefox 500x439 firefox6 0 6 permits improvement but still not fast enough,
     500x442 firefox6 Firefox 3 6 improves memory, but still not fast enough,

    But one of the most important sections and more attractive to users is the speed tests JavaScript , which has again improved over previous editions.

    However, Firefox is still behind its main competitors in this section, and in fact has been 11.50 Opera which has better performance in the test from FutureMark Peacekeeper in our pruebas.Ni even Chrome latest version of the channel developer (Chrome 15) we reach out to Opera, which again speaks highly of the Opera browser software, how we often olvidadito.

     opera 6 1 peacekeeper Firefox 500x469 improvement but still not fast enough,
    11.50 Opera is the best behaved in the JavaScript tests we have done.

    any case, the data from the execution speed of JavaScript, while important, is not decisive for many users. The UI benefits in the day to day management and accessories catalog values ​​are rising, and that’s Chrome seems to be setting the standard .

    Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

    class=”article first_main_article” readability=”43″>

    June 12, 2011 – by techy

    1 comment

    Elementary next version of OS promises many improvements over the bittersweet feeling that we left his first version, and now we have seen in action a draft code-named ‘Luna’ in the hands one of the developers of the project that shows how this distribution based on Ubuntu Linux.

     OS Luna Elementary, fast as lightning

    What is clear to see the video are two things: one, that the author should buy a tripod (or stop drinking, go pulse), and two, that Elementary OS seems to go at full speed .

    As indicated in OMG! Ubuntu!, Responsible for recording the video did tests on a laptop powerful enough with a quad-core i5 Core 2.3 GHz, 4 GB of RAM and a hard drive at 7200 RPM, undoubtedly facilitates the loading process, but still see Elementary OS ‘Luna’ in action is interesting. Indeed, it is expected that this issue appears in November this year.

    In this demo something troubled by the movement of the camera can see how to launch various applications of the system, and even can see the famous Slingshot Elementary OS launcher in action . Do not miss it, and prepare the pill for seasickness than later;)

    Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials