class=”article first_main_article” readability=”55″>

Guillermo Latorre, PlanetUbuntu.es creator and maintainer, has run out of time or motivation to continue in charge of the site, so looking for someone who is willing to continue the job . Any volunteers out there?

PlanetUbuntuES PlanetUbuntu.es looking for a new owner

as you know, is the PlanetUbuntu.es planet (no need to explain what a planet , right?) dedicated to disseminating news related with the Hispanic blogosphere Ubuntu . In fact, I’m sure many of your favorite blogs Ubuntu, MuyLinux included, are added to the site for a long time (that’s where they were going to stop all the news published on Ubuntu category, something that you have complained occasion but we must understand that what interests the user of Ubuntu also be interesting to the user of Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Lubuntu, Linux Mint, etc.., hence our insistence, but it seems that did not play).

Returning

PlanetUbuntu.es, Guillermo Latorre has posted on his blog, HacheMuda, all information about it to anyone willing to take over, making it clear, though, that “respect the rules initial planet is a nonprofit web, in order to disseminate the information to be published in the best blogs on Ubuntu “.

So from MuyLinux give echo to the news, which is that PlanetUbuntu.es has proved a very interesting resource, especially for new users who do not yet know the more interesting ‘ubuntera Hispanic blogosphere ‘ in depth. We therefore hope to announce shortly PlanetUbuntu.es continue.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”35″>

both the free software philosophy and the Open Source advocates a collaborative model according to its creators and supporters allows for greater quality in the development cycle from any tool, and its outcome, of course – but this theoretical superiority is difficult to measure.

 500x357 quality opensource free software quality equal to or greater than the owner

That’s what they tried to do in the consulting Coverity, which together with none other than the Department of Homeland Security U.S. have posted the report Coveruty Scan 2011 Open Source Integrity.

MuyComputerPRO show our colleagues, the study conducted by management and the firm Coverity started in 2006 and is one of the most complete that you remember if you stick to the 300 million lines of proprietary code and 37 million lines of open source analyzed by researchers.

The result: the code of free software and Open Source has at least the same quality as proprietary code, if this is not High in certain respects. You have all the details and conclusions the original story, in MuyComputerPRO.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”35″>

both the free software philosophy and the Open Source advocates a collaborative model according to its creators and supporters allows for greater quality in the development cycle from any tool, and its outcome, of course – but this theoretical superiority is difficult to measure.

 500x357 quality opensource free software quality equal to or greater than the owner

That’s what they tried to do in the consulting Coverity, which together with none other than the Department of Homeland Security U.S. have posted the report Coveruty Scan 2011 Open Source Integrity.

MuyComputerPRO show our colleagues, the study conducted by management and the firm Coverity started in 2006 and is one of the most complete that you remember if you stick to the 300 million lines of proprietary code and 37 million lines of open source analyzed by researchers.

The result: the code of free software and Open Source has at least the same quality as proprietary code, if this is not High in certain respects. You have all the details and conclusions the original story, in MuyComputerPRO.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

first_main_article” class=”article readability=”45″>Oracle Purchasing

Sun did not please the Linux users, who saw the big open source projects from Sun, which had posted strong by that philosophy, were becoming very different things or even seeing a slow demise threatened . Problems with MySQL, Java, OpenOffice.org or OpenSolaris are good examples of this.

 oracle evil wants the Oracle software (including Open Source) owns

increasingly seems to be more clearly the mentality of the firm of Larry Ellison, according to an article on SeekingAlpha is trying to apply copyright to all software so that even applications Open Source proprietary applications become .

FossPatents have also, where they reveal that Oracle is arguing that the APIs, the names of programs, and even the names of subroutines, should have the same copyright protection as the rest of the code, and that protection should be absolute .

That means, in the original article explained that Oracle could not only claim their copyright on MySQL, but on interfaces that connect to other programs and even the names of routines of these programs.

What would cause that? Well interoperability among applications is impossible unless the copyright owner gave permission (perhaps after paying a license fee or permit the use of such copyright).

The problem that arises is even greater than it is affecting the patents to several companies, especially Microsoft and Apple are attacking Android, because Oracle would have total control of MySQL or Java, where now organizations such as Apache Foundation allow authors to keep copyright code on the code .

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials