class=”article first_main_article” readability=”40″>

Any news about Ubuntu and its release cycles discarded move to rolling release model and non-LTS versions are left with half time support, 18 to 9 months . This was decided by the Ubuntu Technical Board, as told in The H Open.

ubuntu1 LTS versions of Ubuntu will not reduce support time in half ... and no rolling release

As you know, the debate about the “times” of Ubuntu has been a hot topic in recent weeks, but at least one thing has already been decided: no version rolling release . On the contrary, what arises is now reduced time of normal versions support half. For what purpose? The offer updated packages in their own upgrades.

apparently support time to save what used to test newer versions of packages to deliver them to the public. That is, the updates received in those nine months will not only security , as has always been, but include new versions of packages . In the coming weeks detailing all changes.

non-LTS versions published and kept as 18 months of support and LTS five years, in both cases, needless to say, only security updates.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”65″>

controversy over Ubuntu still open. Ingredients: Mir, rolling relase and ‘the community ‘. We will try to synthesize information as possible to facilitate understanding, because there is little that has been published so far and it seems that things are not going to be quiet (all links in this entry are required reading if is that we want to have all the data).

 500x333 Ubuntu units, Mir, rolling release, community ... [Updated]

First, rolling release, yes or no? Latest news pointed to the proposal remained on the table, however Mark Shuttleworth is not convinced by the idea too , although he is open to review the release cycles whenever there is consensus. In short, there will be no rolling release for now (you really surprised because someone was not a 4.13 RR ?).

But Shuttleworth spoke much more in his blog in a lengthy article that has not allowed comments. For example refers to discontent on the part of the Ubuntu community , which has not liked the secrecy for Canonical’s latest projects as Mir, the new graphical server . Muktware This article summarizes the situation and gives foremost sources among which has once again Jonathan Riddell, leading developer of Kubuntu, which is quite active lately with his statements.

In fact, Riddell just answered a phrase-and something else-Shuttleworth in which he stated “I have absolutely no doubt that will work well on Mir KWin “, which Riddell says: “ I wonder why not you use KWin then, since after all it will work well with Mir and is based on Q t”. He continues: “But I have doubts that KWin works well with Mir and I’ve said so. You should check the facts before launching such assertions “. He continues with some recriminations towards Shuttleworth / Canonical summarized in ignorance of KWin , any contributions to KWin and no contact with the developers of KWin.

There’s more: “I have to ask you to KWin let off the campaign pro-Mir. I did not ask Mir, Mir and and do not want to read articles like the one that has provoked this response lowers my motivation to have something to do with Mir. Mir is an answer to a question nobody asked. It is a solution to a problem that does not exist. “Some pretty harsh statements for who until recently was an employee of Canonical , but that is why they are quite juicy (there are many more” players “who have joined and this function would be endless, but it is worth recalling what Martin also said Grasslin, KWin maintainer).

unrest in the ‘Ubuntu community’ is obviously beyond the Mir-KWin dilemma, and it speaks Jono Bacon, Ubuntu community manager, usually such a pretty diplomatic and as has again demonstrated. I leave you with what is published on the subject in Libuntu, in one and two articles sum it all pretty well.

What is it? In a situation somewhat blurred that only time will clarify. Or not.


[Updated]

As we indicate in the comments, I have returned to mess up (once again!) and Riddell statements are not yours, but Martin Grasslin , KWin maintainer, that Riddell republic of integrity in his blog, I suppose, to show support.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”59″>

No, we passed one of the day’s news, the new proposal for make Ubuntu a rolling release distro with all of the law, nothing released unless by Rick Spencer, director of engineering at Canonical, according to which the change would benefit both users and developers.

 Ubuntu 500x357 reopens Discussion: Ubuntu as a rolling release?

Broadly speaking, raising Spencer is continuing the LTS as usual, and leave semiannual releases for rolling release distribution and continuous update monthly releases Linux Arch-style, ie mostly updating packages in the installation images (not that Arch Linux do monthly).

This would also include a large monthly update -added that arise every day, for all users of Ubuntu LTS, which ServicePack Windows, as there are delicate items that can not be updated each day, as the kernel, video drivers, etc..

Thus

most enthusiastic users dispondrían always have the latest versions of software stable , while professional users or those who would search for maximum stability, would enjoy extended support releases. Developers, meanwhile, would get rid of the work of preparing the current releases every six months.

The truth is that the suggestion of Spencer has been well received in the Ubuntu mailing list, which has continued to simmer all day, and has even done a Hangout on Google+ (YouTube video) to openly discuss the idea. How could it be otherwise discordant voices claiming that not a matter of scale, but of “actual implementation” , with all that that entails (maintain quality and stability, mainly), have been quick to make themselves heard.

As you know, it’s not the first time he intends to jump into rolling release model from within Canonical , but if one thing is clear is that history going for long. Soon will be held next Ubuntu Developer Summit, which will focus on all of the new versions of Ubuntu for smartphones and tablets, so not expected to address this issue . But who knows.

What is your opinion? Would you like a rolling release Ubuntu in the terms proposed?

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”44″>

Canonical developers are debating a change really crucial in the development cycle distribution, which since its inception has respected that pace for a new version every six months. Ubuntu users have become accustomed to that pace, but that does not mean there is an equally interesting turn distro Ubuntu in a ‘rolling release’ .

 500x365 ubuntu rolling release could be rolling release Ubuntu from Ubuntu 14.04

The best example is probably rolling release distribution Arch Linux, which has become a model of efficiency of this philosophy on which no predetermined cycles of new releases: our distribution is always the last because they are installed components that are considered ready for production automatically.

Actually this behavior is similar to the versions of Windows , who for years have worked with the mechanism of the automatic updates and only looked radically affected Where the appearing service packs, which are merely sets updates. The advantages of a rolling release model are obvious, for example would not have to wait for the next version of Ubuntu to enjoy the improvements in new kernels.

are debating what the Ubuntu developers, as confirmed in a Google Hangout a developer Canonical, indicating that possible migration to a rolling release philosophy from Ubuntu 14.04 , which would the latest version of Ubuntu would respect the classic cycle of 6 months of development.

The downside, as discussed in Ars Technica, is the fact that to some extent rolling releases are usually less stable distributions that distributions with fixed cycles of renovation, especially by the fact that distributions like Ubuntu have the opportunity to have several drafts and plenty of time to detect problems (most, anyway) and fix them before releasing the final versions.

can see the video of this Google Hangout and jump to minute 42 to hear those comments on the possible migration to a rolling release model.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

first_main_article” class=”article readability=”37″>

July 9, 2011 – by MetalByte

1 comment

Mandriva seems not to make news in recent weeks, and it is true. This is what usually happens when a major distribution is about to complete the development cycle for its new version.

mandriva 2011 logo1 Changes in Mandriva Cooker is rolling release

This time the news reaching us Annubis makes a good mandrivero / mageiero of those who do not stand still, but explained very well, so I leave you below with your whole message, whose original publication in BlogDRAKE find:

Gentlemen, as you know from Mandriva 2011, the development version, Cooker, becomes a rolling release. And if you did not know, you know. What is this? Well, that has already been freezing Cooker packages, has created a new branch 2011.0 and within days will begin to put new things in Cooker. Therefore, if you do not want to stay forever and ever in Cook, I recommend that you have installed the previous versions of Mandriva 2011, cambiéis repositories to branch 2011.

Eye

with this news, anyone think Cooker is now like Arch Linux or PCLinuxOS , two of the most famous examples of stable rolling release distribution; Cooker remains a channel development not advisable for production environments or everyday use, unless you know what you are doing.

That said and as

Mandriva web counters do not have the time left for their next release, if there are any last minute change the final version of Mandriva 2011 comes in 50 days .

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Foresight Linux 2.5.0, the intelligent release rolling

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”50″>

March 28, 2011 – by MetalByte

1 comment

Another release more

regard to GNU / Linux. This is a non-stop and under this description adheres well Foresight Linux, a distribution rolling release who has just released version 2.5 .0 .

Foresight Linux 2.5.0 Foresight Linux 2.50, the intelligent rolling release

As always, all information on this release you have it in its official announcement, but then we summarize the developments you find in this peculiar distribution: GNOME 2.32.1, KDE 4.6.1 SC, XFCE 4.8 as desktop environments, Linux Kernel 2.6.35.11 as the heart (the version that remains LTS, considering the stability, on 06/02/1937 repositories is the soon to be upgraded to 06/02/1938). There.

Remember

speak of a rolling release distribution , that is constantly updated, so the news are reduced to the same software which is based . This does not mean that Foresight Linux save interesting concepts in it.

package management Foresight Linux has Conary , a system (source) “ updates only those specific files in packages that need updating in contrast to other formats such as RPM and deb, that download entire packages . “Very well brought this way of doing things in a rolling release , where almost every day for updates .

to do with Foresight Linux 2.5.0 only have to access your download page where you will find DVD images for GNOME, KDE and XFCE SC architectures 32 and 64 bits, plus some editing especially for developers (too many links, so you do not put them here, also include checksums-).

Any user out there Foresight Linux? How’s it going?

Powered By


WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | WordPress Plugin Hud 1