class=”article first_main_article” readability=”43″>

MuyCanal our colleagues say, are more than familiar Microsoft agreements with manufacturers to be in computers. However, rarely speaks of Linux , the free operating system par excellence. Just about the difficulties of included in the market this software, says the study of the Portuguese Association of Business of Open Source.

 linux 500x357 Study on retail sales potential of Linux in stores

a PDF entitled “The oligopoly retailers laptops: the unknown digital divide,” the association said the problems facing the retail to sell computers with Linux operating system built . In fact, the study grew out of another report which detailed sales experience with packages that include Linux preinstalled.

The main difficulty

this study is evidence to the filter imposed by retail settings . Manufacturers do not want to go to market innovative products that can compete with best prices. Indeed, perhaps this is the main advantages of Linux : the price that is opposed to the license fee for Windows or Mac OS X.

also Windows or Mac OS X is not just a paid software. Beyond that, behind the Microsoft operating system there is a universe of programs -antivirus or office suite-configured to sell and still make money. However, in Linux many of them are free and that the profit margin does not exist.

study suggests other reasons that are barriers to the advancement of Linux in this field, and you can get all the data in the original story in MuyCanal .

No related posts.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | WordPress Amazon Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”44″>

As shown in Converged Infrastructure, a joint study by Sonatype firms and Aspect Security has opened the debate by ensuring that most large companies in the Fortune top-500, use applications built on open source components (libraries and frameworks) with security holes .

 open source 500x357 A study casts doubt on the security of Open Source

The report, based on a survey to 2,550 developers, software architects and analysts, argues that open source “overlooks the shortcomings of ecosystems” , mainly due to the lack of a alert notification developers about the vulnerabilities and new versions with corrections. “80% of the code in the applications of today comes from libraries and frameworks. The risk of the vulnerabilities of these components is largely ignored and undervalued “, stand out.

The report states, for example, that there have been 46 million downloads of unsafe versions of libraries and frameworks most popular open source , such as Google Web Toolkit, Spring MVC, Struts 1. X. and Hibernate. Struts 2, which was downloaded over a million times by 18,000 companies, contains a critical vulnerability.

However there are many arguments against the conclusions of the study, as revealed in the original story, Converged Infrastructure .

No related posts.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”44″>

As shown in Converged Infrastructure, a joint study by Sonatype firms and Aspect Security has opened the debate by ensuring that most large companies in the Fortune top-500, use applications built on open source components (libraries and frameworks) with security holes .

 open source 500x357 A study casts doubt on the security of Open Source

The report, based on a survey to 2,550 developers, software architects and analysts, argues that open source “overlooks the shortcomings of ecosystems” , mainly due to the lack of a alert notification developers about the vulnerabilities and new versions with corrections. “80% of the code in the applications of today comes from libraries and frameworks. The risk of the vulnerabilities of these components is largely ignored and undervalued “, stand out.

The report states, for example, that there have been 46 million downloads of unsafe versions of libraries and frameworks most popular open source , such as Google Web Toolkit, Spring MVC, Struts 1. X. and Hibernate. Struts 2, which was downloaded over a million times by 18,000 companies, contains a critical vulnerability.

However there are many arguments against the conclusions of the study, as revealed in the original story, Converged Infrastructure .

No related posts.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

first_main_article” class=”article readability=”46″>

MuyComputer inform our partners, Google’s web browser is also the quickest and fastest growing adoption more security which provides its users in almost all sections.

 Google Chrome Google Chrome 500x357 15 is the most secure web browser according to a study

This statement is based on the results obtained by Accuvant a research company that has undergone Chrome, Internet Explorer 9 and Firefox for analysis at the request of Google itself. The study results leave no doubts and Chrome is the safest web browser.

The reasons for the success of Chrome is based on its efficient sandboxing and the implementation of its plug-in as well as in a “technical vulnerabilities antiexplotación” above, shared also by Internet Explorer 9, which in this and other points is above Firefox. In fact, the Mozilla Web browser, whose release is not commented (at least I have not found it) but it is recent, it is the worst of the three , and that no other browser enters the fray.

Only in the time it takes to fix vulnerabilities Firefox than Internet Explorer, although both remain far behind again against Chrome, whose correction time is counted in 53 days for the 158 and 214 of Firefox and Internet Explorer respectively .

You can download

complete study on this link (PDF), because throughout its 100 pages there is much to discover, if you are interested in the issue .

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Affiliate | Settlement Statement

 1 300x300 facebook logo Facebook study the effect on adolescent behavior When it comes to social networks Facebook is impossible to leave out conversation. The platform created by Mark Zuckerberg is a true Internet phenomenon, but several experts say that compulsive use not good for health , especially the younger ones.

A new study says the “overdose Facebook” can trigger psychological disorders in teens . The research was conducted by a team from California State University led by Dr. Larry Rosen, one of the most renowned teachers of psychology of the entity.

id=”more-16456″>

According to experts

young people who use Facebook develop a strong narcissistic behavior. Have also been cases of antisocial behaviors, mania and aggressive tendencies in adolescents who have “strong presence” (many friends, for an example) in the social network.

this research took a group of 1,000 adolescents, with special emphasis on the behavior of 300 during a study period of 15 minutes. In that period it was found that students with lower grades checked his Facebook account at least once .

But that’s not all, as the specialists saw that students have to check the social network activity showed a retention level reading lower than normal . Anyway, it is noteworthy that not all negative.

According to Rosen, the young regulars Facebook show a highly developed “empathy virtual” . This behavior is remarkable because it allows them to comfort a friend with problems despite not having him around, having a very positive reception across the screen.

Track | Science Daily.

Say that the Internet has changed our life is no longer nothing new. At present many aspects of our daily walk were modified drastically by having access to the Web , and several specialists to conduct studies to know the real impact of the triple W on the human body.

. The article is called “the Google effect on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at your fingertips” .

At work specialists indicate that the Internet is turning us into plants that do not think, but that has changed our ability data retention because we know we can find them again in seconds with a Web connection.

The implication of the study is that it significantly reduced the level of storage in the human brain, but at the turn increased the ability to use external sources to find information. In short, one person may not remember a specific fact, but where to read it .

Anyway, the authors say they have not yet reached a level of dependency Total Internet as people are able to perform many tasks without having to consult previously on the computer . This basically means we are far from becoming a kind similar to Star Trek Bynars

Beyond any nerd joke should be noted that this research is very interesting, and read more about it (in English) on the link at the bottom left the post.

Track | The New York Times.