class=”article first_main_article” readability=”47″>

Btrfs filesystem (Saxons pronounce it as ‘butter’-butter-and sometimes as ‘better’ Best-) is one of the great promises free software : This “eternal” successor to the Ext4 has long been supported in both the kernel and the distributions, that years ago they started offering it as a file system alternative to traditional options.

 suse SUSE btrfs: Btrfs is ready for production systems

However, in many cases this support was too experimental, and although recently Btrfs already offered as a fully functional file system in distributions, all still betting on ext4 as default option.

That has made

think that Btrfs never been mature enough, but we want to remove that SUSE idea. Matthias Eckermann, one of those responsible for SUSE Linux Enterprise Linux, has indicated that “ Btrfs is ready for production systems “, and SLES 11 SP2 has full support for Btrfs addition to other conventional file systems (Ext3, ReiserFS, XFS) … except precisely ext4, which apparently does not measure up to the SUSE distribution business.

These statements are not surprising: SUSE is one of the largest contributors to the Btrfs code , but as outlined in Linux.com by the time the Btrfs support in SLES is not total, and for example of moment not supported multivolume management characteristics as the RAID technology and compression, although plans are to integrate these short term characteristics. Of course, what is true for SLES openSUSE is also true, where in fact use Btrfs latest patches and “aggressive” that integrate the latest features well before the enterprise edition of this distribution.

No related posts.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

class=”article first_main_article” readability=”85″>

news that Canonical would invest in Kubuntu put together quite a stir, although it was clear that the change would not involve any disaster for the continuity of the project , which is now simply a more than “family”, such as Xubuntu or Lubuntu.

kubuntu1 On the future of Kubuntu and the mysterious Blue Systems

As we said at the time, with Kubuntu not going to happen, is that the project is too big so that Canonical can harm simply by withdrawing financial support which he enjoyed, which , I must say, was not to write home about. In any case, Canonical has the right to reserve all their resources to Ubuntu, its true and only bet.

Total

that Kubuntu was not the only developer who collected some of their money by working part-time in the distribution, but nothing came of Blue Systems to handle the situation, offering a financing did not materialize , at least with the public.

But just realize, and OMG! Ubuntu! a few hours ago published some interesting data that, as from May to Blue Systems will pay for two full-time developers to work on Kubuntu , one of which is supposed to be Jonathan Ridell, which remains the project leader (incidentally, also said that not what Canonical invested millions in Kubuntu …).

The first question before this issue is bleeding who are Blue Systems Your website does not give any data, unless sponsor more developments related KDE as:

  • Kubuntu (from now)
  • Netrunner
  • Mint (KDE)
  • kde-gtk-config
  • KDE

  • FolderView
  • rekonq (KDE browser)
  • KDE

  • MenuEditor (QML port)
  • Muon Software Center (QML port)
  • who they are and where they get the money? Follow the trail to the company, so it seems from Germany, is difficult, and the only reliable clue is provided by the whois of the domain, which does not say much except that there is a company dedicated to software behind it: IT works unlimited GmBH.

    Another curious fact is the record of the names of the websites of Blue Systems and Netrunner, KDE-based distribution business approach that coincide, at least that is attached to one end: are the same . Why a company spends money to fund three distributions KDE? It makes no sense … or maybe it does?

    Other information in the article talking OMG! Ubuntu! is that of possible problems that may have Kubuntu with the name , because while the system is addressed to users, no more, no problem, but under the provisions of Canonical, can not be mounted a commercial product using that name, which is what they want to do with Kubuntu Blue Systems.

    It is premature to advance anything, but Canonical a refusal to let Kubuntu use the name for commercial purposes may bring the project to change name , leaving him in a situation almost exactly that Linux Mint live: it is built based on Ubuntu, uses their own repositories and security updates, but until then (which is quite eye!).

    And finally, a figment of staff: Kubuntu and Netrunner will join under a new name and create a distribution with all of the law, based on Ubuntu but with KDE importance deserves? Time will tell, that they say.

    How do you see

    No related posts.

    Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

    class=”article first_main_article” readability=”41″>

    Jonathan Ridell, the developer who has spent seven years working on the development of Kubuntu, has announced that Blue Systems will be the new sponsor of the distribution from the month of May, when the cycle begins development of Kubuntu 12.10.

    kubuntu Kubuntu is sponsored by Blue Systems

    The announcement comes

    just two months after Canonical, makers of Ubuntu, failed to confirm that economic support is derived from Ubuntu with KDE, and would also offer paid support plans for future versions of the distro.

    As noted in The H Open, Blue Systems has collaborated with and sponsored other projects like KDE and Linux distributions or Netrunner Mint. “With this new sponsorship have the independence to give the project new wings and to provide the excellent new audiences KDE software ‘Ridell said.

    From now

    Blue Ridell Systems will pay the payroll to continue working full time in Kubuntu, and have plans to also cover the cost of promotional materials or web servers that store distribution. But: have to talk with Canonical to address trademark issues (Kubuntu / Ubuntu) but Ridell expects no problems in that section.

    we told you was not going to happen (bad) with Kubuntu :)

    No related posts.

    Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

    Siri, the incredible voice recognition program of the brand new iPhone 4S, just started to be cracked. This was announced Applidium the development team, specialists in working with IOS. Recall that Siri was beyond the concept of voice recognition, responding to voice commands from users

    time …

    first_main_article” class=”article readability=”40″>

    Linux users tend to have installed various Linux distributions on your computer, as well as Windows alternatives to choose the environment in which they want to work and enjoy every moment.

     500x378 reboot Reboot unity on other operating systems from Ubuntu

    That makes it useful to have a feature that allows us choose the operating system or Linux distribution that we want to restart the system directly from the restart option of your desktop, something that is possible achieved easily in Ubuntu.

    WebUpd8

    count, which indicates that the utility Unity Reboot is perfect for adding those options on Ubuntu 11.04 and Unity in its interface. To do this we use a PPA repository to install easily:

    sudo apt

     add-ppa-repository: nilarimogard/webupd8sudo apt-get updatesudo apt-get install unity-reboot 

    And then just be missing

    done:

     unity-reboot 

    only need to run the first time. From there you will always be available on our menu Unity restart, but to add the pitcher as the capture will have to do it manually.

    This Nautilus sailed with path ~ / .local / share / applications , and there we will see a file called unity-reboot.desktop, we’ll have to drag Unity pitcher.

    As indicated in the original article, one must take into account additional aspects. If you install a new kernel have to reload the launcher (closing and opening session, for example).

    Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

    class=”article first_main_article” readability=”47″>

    February 3, 2011 – by techy

    0 comments

    MuyLinux pay enough attention to the section of the file systems that has evolved greatly in recent years on Linux and it seems to still have a healthy medium-term development.

    While in Windows or Mac OS X file systems suffer only small changes between version and version in Linux appear more and better alternatives to help you get more out of our storage units.

    That, however, returns to cause some confusion among users . When you have to choose the format of partition and what file system you use for your Linux installations, often pull from the default of every distribution, but the existence of alternatives raises the question of the traditional “What if …? .

    clarify some of these doubts have arisen several articles comparing the performance of various file systems on different distributions. Usually these tests and from Phoronix Test Suite Phoronix of, but now comes a comparative MindPlusPlus in which we analyze the performance Btrfs, Ext2, Ext3, ext4, JFS, XFS ReiserFSy .

    analysis is very good because at first explained in detail the options that you used to configure both the test system as file systems modified for these tests. However, the conclusions are too confusing , and indeed there seems no clear overall winner. In some tests emphasizes the individual winners, but not appear to be a global winner .

    In any case, an interesting read. Do not miss it if you want to have something more clear where the shots go in the field of file systems.

    Powered By WizardRSS
    MuyLinux